First cause: “what created God?”
Bertrand Russell believed that “First Cause arguments” are based
on the assumption that “everything
must have a cause.” Very few metaphysicians in history
were stupid enough
to argue Russell’s “universality of causation”.
A first cause of past
time had to exist because the hypothesis of infinite past time contradicts
the constitutive nature of time necessary to prevent contradictions in history. (if
there is no starting point then there cannot be a before and after the starting
point) Thus, a first
uncaused cause that transcends temporality is necessary.
After showing that there
can be only one uncaused reality, it is easy to show that everything else in all
reality must be caused. This follows by a simple disjunctive
deduction (i.e. everything else besides the one uncaused reality must be
caused). It is not assumed that there can only be one uncaused reality; it
is proven
If Russell had assessed any
rigorous proofs for the existence of God, he would never have asked the
question, “what created God?” Rigorous
proofs first demonstrate that there must be at least one uncaused cause (They certainly do not assume that
everything must be caused as Russell suggests). Rigorous proofs then go on to
demonstrate that there can only be one uncaused cause,( uncaused =
first, by definition of “first” there can be only one first) which leads
inevitably to the deduction that everything
else besides the one uncaused cause, must be caused.
First cause: “what created God?”
Bertrand Russell believed that “First Cause arguments” are based
on the assumption that “everything
must have a cause.” Very few metaphysicians in history
were stupid enough
to argue Russell’s “universality of causation”.
A first cause of past
time had to exist because the hypothesis of infinite past time contradicts
the constitutive nature of time necessary to prevent contradictions in history. (if
there is no starting point then there cannot be a before and after the starting
point) Thus, a first
uncaused cause that transcends temporality is necessary.
After showing that there
can be only one uncaused reality, it is easy to show that everything else in all
reality must be caused. This follows by a simple disjunctive
deduction (i.e. everything else besides the one uncaused reality must be
caused). It is not assumed that there can only be one uncaused reality; it
is proven
If Russell had assessed any
rigorous proofs for the existence of God, he would never have asked the
question, “what created God?” Rigorous
proofs first demonstrate that there must be at least one uncaused cause (They certainly do not assume that
everything must be caused as Russell suggests). Rigorous proofs then go on to
demonstrate that there can only be one uncaused cause,( uncaused =
first, by definition of “first” there can be only one first) which leads
inevitably to the deduction that everything
else besides the one uncaused cause, must be caused.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario